Author Archives: News All Around

Barrister Aminu Hussaini – Examines How Triple Threats of Money, Might, and Chaotic Litigations Sets Nigeria’s Democracy at Risk

As Nigeria moves steadily toward the 2027 general elections, a familiar and troubling pattern is resurfacing: our democracy is being contested long before citizens approach the polling booths. Increasingly, political battles are fought not in town halls, rallies or debates, but in courtrooms, party secretariats, private villas and the shadows of unchecked financial influence.
When democracy goes to court before the voter arrives, the heart of electoral legitimacy is compromised; unless we confront this drift, 2027 risks becoming another election decided by judicial technicalities, power blocs and influence peddlers—not the will of the Nigerian people.
The Courtroom Is Not a Campaign Ground
Certainly, there is no democracy without an independent judiciary; but there is also no healthy democracy when litigation replaces voter persuasion and legal technicalities overshadow voter decisions. In this dispensation, pre-election court cases have mushroomed to unprecedented levels. Instead of focusing on policies, candidates invest in legal teams to disqualify opponents, overturn primaries or secure favorable interpretations of party rules, electoral law and election guidelines.
While the courts play a vital role in resolving disputes, their increasing involvement before and after elections weakens the mandate that should come from the electorate. When judges determine who appears on the ballot and who occupies position more than voters do, democracy becomes distorted.
Money: The Invisible Voter
Financial influence has become one of the most determining factors of Nigerian electoral process and outcomes. The monetization of the political process—from party forms that cost millions, to delegates’ primaries drenched in cash, to open vote-buying on election day—has made public office obviously purchasable.
In the buildup to 2027, there is already evidence of an arms race of money. But democracy should not and cannot be an auction. When the candidate with the deepest pockets surpasses the candidate with the best ideas and pedigree, the entire nation pays the price.
Might and Intimidation: The Dark Edge of Nigerian Politics
Nigeria’s elections are often marred by a subtle but powerful coercive force: the deployment of political thugs, the misuse of security agencies and the intimidation of both voters and electoral officials. If citizens cannot cast their votes freely, without fear of intimidation or manipulation of their votes, then we do not have elections—what we have are simply rituals of staged participation. As 2027 approaches, Nigerians must insist that the ballot paper not the bully or manipulation, remains the instrument of choice. Stakeholders’ manipulative tendencies must be resisted and totally rejected. We must understand and believe that our destiny would not be served on a platter of gold. True freedom is always wrested not given!
Manipulation From Within
Manipulation does not only occur at polling units. It often begins much earlier—through compromised party primaries, doctored delegate lists, parallel congresses and last-minute candidate substitutions. These internal manipulations set the stage for disputed outcomes and post-election chaos.
Regrettably, when the foundations are shaky, the entire democratic structure trembles.
Why the Popular Vote Must Be Supreme in 2027
For Nigeria to move forward, the legitimacy of leaders must come from the people—not from court rulings, kingmakers or financial powerhouses. The 2027 season provide a crucial opportunity to reinforce the principles of free, fair and credible elections which require transparent and technology-backed electoral processes that prioritize voters over power brokers; political finance reforms to curb the corrupting force of money; internal party democracy that is credible, inclusive, and free from manipulation; judicial restraint and speedy processes ensuring courts do not become substitutes for elections as well as security neutrality to guarantee voter safety and trust.
To succeed, we must believe in being strong even when it seems to be impossible. It is said that if you really want to eat, keep climbing; the fruits are on the top of the tree; stretch your hands and keep stretching them; success is on the top. One cannot score a goal when sitting on the bench; to do so, one has to dress up and enter the game. Yes, WE CAN DO IT by securing our PVCs and getting set and determine to change the impossible with it! Democracy thrives when the ballot box speaks louder than any court order or political godfather.
2027: A Defining Moment
Nigeria is at a decisive crossroads.
Citizens are increasingly aware, vocal and determined to reclaim their democratic power. But the system must make space for their voices to matter. If the results of the 2027 elections are to enjoy national and international respect, they must reflect the true will of the Nigerian people—not the interests of a privileged minority.
Our democracy must not go to court before the voter arrives. This cherished democracy must go to the polling booth—where it truly belongs. The power to shape Nigeria’s future lies with its citizens. In 2027, the popular vote must not merely be counted; it MUST be respected, protected and allowed to decide.

This opinion was contributed by Barrister Aminu Hussaini Sagagi, Special Adviser to the Governor of Kano State, Alhaji Abba Kabir Yusuf, on Justice & Constitutional Matters.

CLEEN Foundation has launched a three-day Women, Peace and Security (WPS) Stakeholder Inception Training and commenced the formal inauguration of State Multi-Stakeholder Implementation and Monitoring Committees (SMIMCs) across five project states—Kaduna, Nasarawa, Imo, Plateau, and Benue.

The initiative, carried out in collaboration with state-level partners, is designed to strengthen the domestication and effective implementation of Nigeria’s National Action Plan (NAP) on Women, Peace and Security. It targets the deepening of coordinated responses to the gendered impacts of conflict, insecurity, and governance deficiencies, which continue to disproportionately affect women and girls, particularly in North-Central and South-East Nigeria.

Speaking during the opening day of the training in Kaduna State, the Executive Director of CLEEN Foundation, Peter Maduoma—represented by Programme Manager, Chigozirim Okoro—lamented that despite Nigeria’s commitments to advancing the WPS agenda, sub-national implementation has remained weak, fragmented, and poorly coordinated.

“Several states either lack functional State Action Plans or have inactive implementation structures, resulting in minimal progress on key WPS pillars, including participation, protection, prevention, relief, and recovery,” he said.

The newly inaugurated SMIMCs are designed to serve as inclusive coordination platforms that bring together government agencies, security institutions, civil society groups, traditional and religious leaders, women mediators, youth groups, and the media. These committees will plan, oversee, and monitor WPS interventions in their respective states, ensuring alignment with national frameworks while adapting strategies to local contexts.

CLEEN Foundation further explained that the committees will track state-level commitments under the Security Accountability Project (SAP), enhance collaboration among institutions, and promote gender-sensitive decision-making in peace and security processes.

The ongoing inception workshops are building the technical capacity of committee members on WPS principles, monitoring tools, reporting frameworks, and coordination mechanisms. Participants will also develop state-specific implementation roadmaps to guide the operationalization of WPS commitments.

Each state training is expected to host at least 30 participants drawn from the Ministries of Women Affairs, Justice, and Internal Security; State Houses of Assembly gender committees; security agencies including the Police, DSS, Civil Defence, Correctional Service, and the military; faith-based and traditional institutions; media stakeholders; and members of the WPS, He4She ambassadors, and SIC networks.

The inception workshops have already taken place in Imo, Nasarawa, and Benue States between November 11 and 13, while Plateau and Kaduna States are hosting theirs from November 18 to 20, 2025.

Across the five project states, CLEEN Foundation expects strengthened coordination, improved accountability, increased visibility of WPS commitments, and expanded engagement of women and youth in peace and security decision-making processes.

Christian and Muslim organisations under the umbrella of the Coalition for Peace and Justice have concluded plans to convene a National Mega Peace Summit aimed at promoting unity and strengthening the fight against insecurity across Nigeria.

The interfaith summit, scheduled to hold next week Saturday in Kaduna and Abuja, is expected to attract grassroots religious leaders from across the country, particularly from the northern region.

In a press statement jointly signed by the Chairman and Secretary, Dr. Othman Musa Idris and Pastor John Simon Jita, the coalition reaffirmed that unity, mutual understanding and collective action remain essential to overcoming the forces threatening the nation’s peace and development.

According to the organisers, the summit will provide a strategic platform for Christian and Muslim leaders to engage in dialogue, exchange perspectives and develop joint approaches to tackling the rising threats of terrorism, banditry and violent extremism.

They noted that faith leaders play a critical role in shaping public attitudes and influencing community responses to security challenges. The gathering, therefore, seeks to harness their influence in mobilising communities toward peacebuilding, conflict resolution and improved security cooperation.

Discussions at the summit will also focus on practical steps to end violence, foster peaceful coexistence and reinforce the shared commitment of both religions to safeguarding lives and restoring stability in affected communities.

At the end of the deliberations, a joint communiqué is expected, outlining agreed positions, recommendations and a coordinated framework to support national security efforts and advance sustainable peace across the country.

A heated exchange ensued on Monday in Abuja between former Minister of Transportation, Rt. Hon. Chibuike Rotimi Amaechi, and former Kaduna Central Senator, Shehu Sani, during the National Electoral Reforms Summit 2025, as both clashed over the performance of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s administration.

Amaechi, in his remarks at the summit organized by the Movement for Electoral Reform, took a swipe at the current administration, describing it as “insensitive to the yearnings of Nigerians.” He lamented the worsening hardship across the country, accusing the government of failing to deliver good governance and protect citizens from economic suffering.

“People are suffering, yet there is no ASUU, no NLC, no NANS to mount pressure on the government. Nigerians are quiet when they should be demanding accountability,” Amaechi said, warning that Tinubu’s government is “defeatable” through democratic means.

However, his comments immediately drew a strong reaction from Senator Sani, who accused Amaechi of hypocrisy, reminding him of his own record in public service.

“You were part of governance from the state to the centre for many years, with little or no remarkable achievement,” Sani fired back. “You are now attacking Nigerians for not protesting, but you yourself never led any protest when you were in power.”

The former lawmaker argued that many of the challenges now blamed on Tinubu’s administration were created by previous leaders — including those who served under both the PDP and APC governments since 1999.

“All that he is pointing out as bad were problems created by leaders like him. It is ironic that after two years out of power, he has suddenly become a critic,” Sani added.

The National Electoral Reforms Summit 2025, held in Abuja, brought together politicians, civil society leaders, and electoral experts to deliberate on strengthening Nigeria’s democratic institutions ahead of future elections.

Other notable participants included Dr. Usman Bugaje, IPAC Chairman Peter Ameh, former SDP presidential candidate Prince Adewole Adebayo, Dr. Yunusa Tanko, Dr. Oby Ezekwesili, and Senator Eyinnaya Abaribe.

The fiery Amaechi–Sani exchange became the highlight of the summit, drawing mixed reactions from attendees who described it as a reflection of the growing ideological and moral divides within Nigeria’s political elites.

---

In the wake of the United States’ Allegation of Christian Genocide and the Designation of Nigeria as a “Country of Particular Concern”, Your Excellency, Sir, there is an urgent need to convene Council of State meeting to address the matter.

May peace, wisdom and divine guidance continue to be upon you as you steer the affairs of our great nation at this critical moment in history.

I humbly write this open letter, Your Excellency, not out of disregard for established channels of communication, but out of necessity and duty.

“Convening the Council of State will project confidence to both domestic and international observers – a clear demonstration that Nigeria’s leadership is united, alert and proactive in defending its sovereignty.”

My current position and limited access to the Presidency make it difficult for me to reach you directly. However, the gravity of recent international developments compel me, as a legal practitioner and public servant deeply committed to Nigeria’s sovereignty and unity, to raise this urgent matter through this open medium.

---

The Urgent Context

Your Excellency, the recent action of the United States Government – designating Nigeria a “country of particular concern” (CPC) over alleged religious persecution, coupled with open statements from some US officials and political figures hinting at possible sanctions and even military intervention – has sent shockwaves through the diplomatic, legal and security corridors of our dear nation.

These allegations of a so-called “Christian Genocide” in Nigeria are extremely grave. Whether rooted in misinformation, incomplete data or misrepresentation of our complex internal security realities, they carry the potential to damage our sovereignty, national image and international standing.

---

Why the Council of State Needs to Be Convened

The Nigerian Council of State, as established under Section 153 of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 (as amended), exists precisely to advise the President on matters of national importance. The present crisis undoubtedly falls within this purview.

“A Council session will enable the Federal Government to coordinate a well-grounded diplomatic and legal response to the US designation, including the preparation of a verifiable data on religious freedom, human rights and counterterrorism efforts in Nigeria.”

I most humbly urge Your Excellency to summon an emergency session of the Council of State for the following reasons:

---

1. To Defend National Sovereignty and Unity

The mention of possible foreign military action constitutes a direct challenge to Nigeria’s sovereignty. Bringing together former Heads of State, serving State Governors, the Chief Justice and other constitutional members will send a powerful message of national unity – that Nigerians, regardless of region, religion or political persuasion, stand together in defence of our territorial integrity and constitutional order.

---

2. To Formulate a Coherent Diplomatic Response

A Council session will enable the Federal Government to coordinate a well-grounded diplomatic and legal response to the US designation, including the preparation of verifiable data on religious freedom, human rights and counterterrorism efforts in Nigeria.

“By convening the Council of State now, Your Excellency, you will not only reaffirm our democratic institutions but also strengthen your administration’s legacy as a bridge-builder in turbulent times.”

It will also provide an opportunity to design a proactive engagement strategy with Washington, United Nations, ECOWAS and African Union.

---

3. To Reassess Domestic Security and Humanitarian Realities

While refuting exaggerated claims, we must also seize this opportunity to reassess our internal security operations. The Council can review updated reports from the military, police and intelligence agencies; examine patterns of violence in affected regions and recommend comprehensive measures to prevent further civilian casualties – Christian and Muslim alike.

---

4. To Reinforce National Cohesion and Prevent Religious Polarization

The allegation of a “Christian Genocide” risks inflaming sectarian tensions within Nigeria. An open, unified communication strategy emanating from the Council of State – representing all regions and faiths – will help dispel fear, correct misinformation and prevent opportunistic elements from exploiting religious sentiments.

---

5. To Address Legal and International Risks

As a lawyer, I must respectfully emphasize that any talk of foreign military intervention without Nigeria’s consent violates the United Nations Charter and International Law. Nevertheless, the threat alone can have destabilizing diplomatic and economic consequences. The Council of State can thus deliberate on the appropriate legal, diplomatic and political instruments to safeguard Nigeria’s interest under the International Law.

---

6. Economic and Reputational Considerations

The CPC designation, if left unaddressed, could discourage foreign investment, strain bilateral relations and lead to sanctions that affect development aid and security cooperation. Convening the Council of State will project confidence to both domestic and international observers – a clear demonstration that Nigeria’s leadership is united, alert and proactive in defending its sovereignty.

---

A Call For Strategic Statesmanship

Your Excellency, Nigeria has weathered many storms – from civil war to insurgency to international pressure – and has always emerged stronger through wise, inclusive and timely leadership.

By convening the Council of State now, you will not only reaffirm our democratic institutions but also strengthen your administration’s legacy as a bridge-builder in turbulent times.

---

Conclusion

Mr. President, Sir, I trust that you will receive this letter in the spirit of patriotism and constructive counsel in which it is offered. History will remember that at a moment of heightened international tension, the Nigerian President listened to reasoned advice and rallied the nation’s leaders – past and present – to speak with one voice for unity, justice and peace.

May God Almighty continue to guide Your Excellency with wisdom and courage as you lead our nation forward.

---

Respectfully submitted,
Barrister Aminu Hussaini
Special Adviser to the Executive Governor of Kano State on Justice/Constitutional Matters
Kano, Nigeria
📧 aminuhussaini173@gmail.com

Dated: November 7, 2025

By Aminu Hussaini Sagagi

“The U.S’s accusation of alleged “Christian Genocide” against Nigeria with a threat of possible military action against the country would constitute a breach of International Law.
Analysts warn that, without recourse to any United Nation’s declaration, however noble the US unilateral intervention might seem within the country’s public policy perspective, the “action” smacks of violation of the very principles that sustain the global order.
Barrister Aminu Hussain Sagagi in this article highlights why Kano State Government align with the Federal Government stand, examining how the US’s threat against Nigeria would further escalate strain relationship and the resultant effect may lead Nigeria to embrace alternative global partners such as China or Russia – a shift that could reshape the regional alliances”.

In a move that has sent ripples through diplomatic circles across Africa, U.S. President Donald J. Trump has designated Nigeria a “Country of Particular Concern” (CPC) under U.S. religious-freedom laws, alleging a “genocide of Christians.” He also warned of possible U.S. military action, a statement that has sparked intense debate over international law, sovereignty and the limits of moral intervention in global affairs.
Trump, speaking via his Truth Social platform, accused Nigeria’s leadership of “turning a blind eye” to the alleged killings of Christians, calling the situation “an existential threat to Christianity.” The U.S. Department of State confirmed that the designation was made under the International Religious Freedom Act of 1998, which enables sanctions against nations found to be violating religious freedom in a “systematic and egregious” manner.

The Federal Government of Nigeria, under President Bola Ahmed Tinubu, has rejected both the allegations and the label, describing them as “misinformed and unfounded.” Officials insist that Nigeria remains committed to protecting citizens of all faiths and that the violence ravaging parts of the country stems from terrorism, banditry and resource competition, not state-sponsored religious persecution.

Amid the diplomatic storm, the Kano State Government, led by His Excellency, Alhaji Abba Kabir Yusuf, has declared its full solidarity with the Federal Government and the People of Nigeria. In a statement issued in Kano, Governor Yusuf reaffirmed the State’s unwavering loyalty to the Nigerian federation and condemned attempts to portray the nation as a site of religious genocide. “Nigeria is a united and resilient country where Christians and Muslims have lived together for generations,” the statement read. “Kano stands firmly with the Federal Government in defending our sovereignty, our diversity and our dignity in the comity of nations.”
While the CPC designation itself is primarily diplomatic, Trump’s accompanying threat of deploying U.S. forces has raised serious legal questions. Under Article 2(4) of the United Nations Charter, member States are prohibited from using or threatening force against the territorial integrity of another Member State unless in self-defence or with UN Security Council authorization. Without Nigeria’s consent, analysts warn, any U.S. military action would constitute a breach of International Law.
Nigeria is not a failed State; any unilateral intervention, however noble it may seem within the public policy perspective of the USA or Europe, would violate the very principles that sustain the global order.

The use of the term genocide is particularly contentious. Under the Genocide Convention of 1948, genocide requires proof of intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnic or religious group. Human-rights organizations acknowledge that Nigeria faces severe insecurity – including attacks by Boko Haram, ISWAP and armed militias – but warn against oversimplifying the conflict as one of religion.
The violence affects Muslims and Christians alike. It’s driven by a noxious mix of poverty, climate stress, extremism and weak governance – not by any single religious agenda.

The U.S. move risks straining one of its most strategic relationships in Africa. Nigeria is a key partner in counterterrorism, regional stability and economic development. The Nigerian Senate has called for calm diplomacy, urging engagement with Washington. The African Union has also expressed concern, warning that “unilateral actions under humanitarian pretexts” could undermine African sovereignty and set troubling precedents.
Should relations deteriorate further, experts warn, Nigeria could pivot toward alternative global partners such as China or Russia – a shift that could reshape regional alliances.
Trump’s rhetoric has revived the age-old debate about the intersection of morality and power in international relations. Proponents say Washington is right to speak out against persecution, while critics argue that selective interventions erode credibility and risk weaponing human rights.
“Religious freedom is an important value,” says Dr. Samuel Adebayo, a Nigerian diplomat and governance scholar. “But turning moral advocacy into a pretext for coercion blurs the line between protection and interference.”

For now, Nigeria’s leadership – buoyed by broad domestic support, including that of Kano State and other subnational governments – appears united in rejecting the U.S. narrative. While sanctions or diplomatic restrictions could follow, actual military action remains unlikely and legally indefensible without UN approval or Nigerian consent.
As Nigeria continues to confront terrorism, inequality and communal conflicts, its leaders insist that reform and reconciliation must come from within – not through threats from abroad. The unfolding episode, analysts say, will test not just Nigeria’s resilience, but also the world’s commitment to the delicate balance between sovereignty and global conscience.

Barrister Aminu Hussaini is a Special Adviser on Justice/Constitutional Matters to His Excellency, the Executive Governor of Kano State, Alhaji Abba Kabir Yusuf

When we first red the words of President Donald Trump on social media over the weekend that he may send U.S troops into Nigeria over what he described as “Christian killings” in this country, we felt more than surprise. We felt the sharp pang of a violation, not only of facts, but of our dignity as a sovereign nation.

We are saying this as plainly as possible: yes, Nigeria suffers insecurity. But no, we do not live under a campaign of targeted genocide against Christians. Violence in Nigeria is not shaped by faith alone. It is shaped by geography, by poverty, by criminal networks, and by terror groups who kill indiscriminately both Christians and Muslims, infact more Muslims have been killed by these groups than Christians.

When a foreign power threatens invasion or military action on behalf of one religious group, we must see it not as defence, but as interference. It risks dividing us further, weakening our national resolve, and eroding the principle that no external actor takes orders from a sovereign that will not give them. In that moment, we must remind ourselves: we are Nigerians first. United in diversity. Bound by shared citizenship.

President Trump has claimed there are “record numbers of Christians being killed in Nigeria,” suggesting U.S. military action could follow unless those “killings” stop. He even placed Nigeria once more on the so-called “Countries of Particular Concern” list, citing alleged religious freedom violations. When violence occurs in northern or central Nigeria, it may strike Christian communities, especially in mixed-religion zones, but the pattern is not one of religious extermination. It is instead a pattern of insecurity that fails us all. It undermines farmers, destroys villages, displaces families and leaves both Christians and Muslims reeling in pain and anguish.

We must state clearly: Nigeria is a sovereign state. We do not take orders from another sovereign, whether in rhetoric or in action. If any foreign leader believes that military operations can simply be imposed on Nigeria because of alleged human rights violations, then that undermines our constitutional independence. If the U.S. has concerns about religious freedom or violence, there are diplomatic channels, partnership frameworks, multilateral mechanisms. But they do not extend to invading a country under the banner of defence of one religious group. That is dangerous. It could set a precedent not just for Nigeria, but for all nations.

We also must remember: the United States itself faces severe internal challenges. Gun violence, domestic terrorism, civil unrest, fracturing communities etc. These are real issues within its own borders. It is somewhat ironic to issue threats of military intervention abroad while your own soil is grappling with violence. Perhaps America should look inward and address its challenges before brandishing threats against another country.

That said, we cannot dismiss the reality: Nigeria does face a ravaging insecurity crisis. Boko Haram, ISWAP, bandits, kidnappers, ethno-communal violence etc. These are real and they harm people, regardless of faith. We must acknowledge that the government, security forces, civil society and citizens are striving every day to curb the carnage.
There are efforts under way: military operations in the northeast, patrols in rural communities, peace-building dialogues, policing reforms, attempts at disarmament, investment in local conflict resolution mechanisms and coordination with international partners who support not through threats, but through capacity-building.

We must support that. We must urge it. Because while external threats of invasion are misguided, internal reform is both necessary and urgent. Our leaders must be held accountable. Our security architecture must be improved. Our communities must heal.

In this moment of tension, Nigerians must resist the temptation to divide along religious lines. We must reject false narratives that places Christians against Muslims or one region against another. Such division plays into the hands of violent actors which are the terrorists, the extremists, the opportunists, who thrive in fragmentation.

Let us instead remind ourselves of who we are: a country of over 200 million people, with many faiths and ethnicities, united by a shared aspiration for peace, security and development. When we say “security for all,” we mean every Nigerian, regardless of faith or tribe.

When foreign voices threaten intervention in the name of one group, we should see that as a call not to turn inward in anger alone, but to stand outward in solidarity. We must also call on our leaders to continue to fight insurgency, modernise our security forces, ensure justice for victims, invest in community protection and reform local governance. Let our security strategy be shaped by Nigerians first, with Nigerian consent, not by pressure applied from beyond our borders.

Conclusively, let us not celebrate the absurd idea that an American leader might invade our land for alleged failures that do not reflect the full picture. That kind of rhetoric divides more than it heals.
Instead, let us affirm our unity. Let us work harder to build a security architecture that protects all Nigerians. Let us demand good governance, efficient security service, and genuine justice. Let us resist external coercion, and stand tall under our own flag.

May we remain one people, one nation, committed to peace, justice and greater destiny under God Almighty.

Dr. Awwal Abdullahi Aliyu, President, Northern Consensus Movement for peace unity empowerment and Development initiative. NSNCM.

President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s Renewed Hope Agenda is the overarching philosophy guiding his administration’s policies, which focus on restoring confidence, attracting investments, and empowering citizens through various initiatives.

“Renewed hope” means a revived or re-established sense of optimism and belief in a positive future, often after a period of difficulty or disappointment. It signifies regaining hope and confidence, whether through personal effort, external programs, or spiritual means, to overcome challenges and strive for a better life.

For Dr. Mustapha Abdullahi, Director General of the Energy Commission of Nigeria (ECN), his devotion and dedication to attracting investments in the energy sector and striving to put the sector on the global map is highly commendable.

As a dedicated believer in the Renewed Hope Agenda and its benefits to Nigerians, he has made remarkable progress in repositioning the energy sector.

Recently, Dr. Mustapha Abdullahi recorded a great feat and landmark achievement as he finalized a partnership between Nigeria and the world’s largest solar panel production company, LONGi, at its headquarters in Xi’an, Shaanxi, China.

Nigeria, through the Energy Commission of Nigeria (ECN), concluded this strategic partnership with LONGi, the world’s leading solar technology manufacturer. The Nigerian delegation, led by Dr. Abdullahi, was received by President Boshen Zhong and Vice President Li Wenxue of LONGi, who took them on a tour of one of the world’s largest solar cell production facilities.

The visit followed the Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) signed between ECN and LONGi in London earlier this year. During the visit, Dr. Abdullahi advanced discussions on establishing a 500–1000 MW solar panel production factory in Nigeria — a move set to significantly boost the nation’s renewable energy capacity.

ECN’s presentation to LONGi highlighted Africa’s growing market and the increasing demand for solar mini-grids. It also emphasized President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s Renewed Hope Solarisation Policy, which seeks to accelerate access to clean and affordable energy across Nigeria.

LONGi expressed strong interest in investing in Nigeria and demonstrated readiness to advance concrete plans for the construction of the factory. This partnership marks a historic milestone for the Nigerian renewable energy landscape and aligns with national efforts to expand local solar manufacturing capacity.

The ECN, under Dr. Abdullahi’s visionary leadership, is working assiduously to ensure that Nigerians enjoy improved electricity supply. His management team is delivering on the Renewed Hope Initiative of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s administration, particularly its policy on solarisation. The Commission looks forward to working closely with LONGi and the Federal Government to realize this transformative initiative, which will create jobs, enhance energy security, and drive sustainable development across the country.

In another positive development and in constant pursuit of delivering the benefits of the Renewed Hope Agenda to Nigerians, the Energy Commission of Nigeria, through its DG Dr. Mustapha Abdullahi, signed a Memorandum of Understanding with UNIDACO Limited, London, for an initial €100 million investment in Nigeria’s energy sector.

Speaking on the development, Dr. Abdullahi stated, “The signing, held at the House of Lords, London, during the Renewed Hope Global Dialogue (UK Edition), marks a major milestone in advancing Nigeria’s clean energy transition.”

According to him, “This partnership underscores our commitment to expanding renewable energy access, driving innovation, and strengthening Nigeria’s capacity to harness clean technologies. Moreover, it aligns with President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s Renewed Hope Agenda, particularly on sustainable energy solutions as a catalyst for economic growth and development.”

He added that the distinctive MoU was signed in the presence of dignitaries and investors of repute from Nigeria and across the world. “Overall, this milestone reaffirms our resolve to deepen global partnerships that will accelerate Nigeria’s energy transformation. Together, we are charting a new course toward an inclusive, energy-secure, and prosperous nation built on innovation and collaboration,” Dr. Abdullahi concluded.

With ardent adherents of the Renewed Hope Agenda like Dr. Mustapha Abdullahi, Director General of the Energy Commission of Nigeria, the government of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu is truly walking the talk of the Renewed Hope Agenda.

By Our Reporter

By Aminu Hussaini

Kano State is crucial to Nigeria’s security and economic future, serving as a shield and gateway. The state’s strategic location and economic significance is important to national stability. Barrister Aminu Hussaini Sagagi in this write up examines why Kano’s strategic security and a major economic driver, deserves a dedicated federal funding, with infrastructure investment, and institutionalization as a special Federal Security and Economic Status.

---

In the unfolding dynamics of Nigeria’s national security and economic future, Kano State stands as both a shield and a gateway — a critical axis whose stability is indispensable to the peace and prosperity of the nation. The strategic need for the Federal Government to accord Kano a special Federal Security and Economic Status has become not just desirable but urgent, given the State’s centrality as a security buffer zone and a commercial hub vital to Nigeria’s regional and continental aspirations.

This urgency has been underscored by recent reports of bandit incursions in Shanono Local Government Area, signaling the growing fragility of the northern security belt. These attacks are a stark reminder that even relatively stable states like Kano are not immune to the spillover of violence from surrounding regions. The time to act is now — before the ripple of insecurity breaches Kano’s long-standing resilience.

A Strategic Security Buffer in Northern Nigeria

Kano occupies a rare and irreplaceable position in Nigeria’s security architecture. It sits at the crossroads of the North-West, North-East, and North-Central regions, all corridors of complex conflicts involving insurgency, banditry and communal tension.

For over a decade, Kano has served as a stabilizing buffer, preventing the contagion of insecurity from neighbouring states such as Kaduna, Zamfara, Katsina, Bauchi and Yobe. This function has not happened by accident; it is the product of community vigilance, responsible governance and proactive local collaboration with federal security agencies.

But with the recent rise in cross-border bandit activity, especially the attacks in Shanono, the State’s strategic insulation faces serious strain. If Kano’s stability falters, the humanitarian and economic consequences could be national in scale. This is why the Federal Government must act swiftly to institutionalize Kano’s protection through a clearly defined federal security framework.

A Federal Security and Economic Designation

Kano’s significance transcends local or regional boundaries. Its stability underpins national cohesion, northern economic productivity, and inter-state commerce.

What the moment demands is an official Federal Security and Economic Designation — a framework that integrates military, intelligence and economic interventions under a unified federal structure, akin to the model used for the Niger Delta and the Federal Capital Territory. Such a designation would ensure dedicated federal funding, enhanced security coordination and infrastructural investment aligned with Kano’s role as Nigeria’s northern economic hub.

Economic Gateway to the African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA)

Kano is more than a domestic stronghold; it is Nigeria’s gateway to continental trade. With the operationalization of the African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA), Kano’s position as a commercial and logistics hub becomes a matter of national strategy.

The State connects Nigeria directly to the Sahel and North Africa through well-established trade routes and emerging infrastructure like the Kano–Maradi railway, Aminu Kano International Airport and the Dala Inland Dry Port. To ignore Kano’s economic potential is to undermine Nigeria’s leverage in the AfCFTA framework.

A Federal Economic Zone status would strengthen these corridors, attract investment and institutionalize Kano as a major driver of Nigeria’s regional export economy.

A Moment of Opportunity under a Progressive State Administration

This is also a moment of historic alignment between opportunity and leadership. Kano today is governed by an aggressively progressive administration, under His Excellency, Alhaji Abba Kabir Yusuf — one that has demonstrated readiness to reform, innovate and partner constructively with the Federal Government.

Seizing this window of cooperation is crucial. A federal intervention now will not only reinforce Kano’s stability but also amplify the developmental momentum already being driven by the State Government in areas such as education, urban renewal, industrial revitalization and youth empowerment.

Waiting for instability to escalate before responding would be a costly mistake. The Shanono incident should be treated as a warning shot — not an isolated occurrence. The Federal Government must act with dispatch, leveraging the synergy with Kano’s reform-minded administration to secure and strengthen the State’s strategic role in Nigeria’s future.

Why Federal Designation is Essential

Granting Kano this dual status — as a Federal Security and Economic Zone — will institutionalize federal security coordination in the State; protect national industrial and commercial assets; enhance cross-border trade and anti-smuggling frameworks; strengthen Nigeria’s northern logistics corridor for the AfCFTA; and reinforce national unity through shared economic prosperity.

Such a designation could be achieved via Presidential Executive Order or Legislative Action, providing a durable legal basis for sustained federal engagement and investment.

Conclusion

Kano’s stability is not just a regional issue, it is a national imperative. With rising insecurity in the northern corridors and new economic frontiers opening under the AfCFTA, Kano’s role as both a fortress and a frontier must be preserved and enhanced.

The Federal Government has before it a rare convergence of opportunity and necessity: a progressive State leadership willing to collaborate and a moment demanding swift, strategic action.

To delay is to invite crisis. To act now is to safeguard the nation’s future. Because when Kano stands, Nigeria stands. Kano must never be allowed to fall.

---

This piece is contributed by Barrister Aminu Hussaini, the Special Adviser on Justice/Constitutional Matters to His Excellency, Alhaji Abba Kabir Yusuf, Executive Governor of Kano State.

By Baka Dagacin

The Middle Belt Forum (MBF) has commended the Governors of Bauchi and Kaduna States, Senator Bala Abdulkadir Mohammed and Senator Uba Sani, for their bold steps in revitalizing traditional leadership institutions and promoting fairness among long-marginalized ethnic communities.

In a statement released on Tuesday, MBF National Publicity Secretary, Luka Binniyat, hailed Governor Bala Mohammed’s decision to create 13 new Emirates and the long-awaited Zaar (Sayawa) Chiefdom as a landmark achievement that corrects historical injustices dating back to the colonial era.

According to Binniyat, the creation of the Zaar Chiefdom fulfills a century-old dream of the Zaar people, who had long sought recognition of their distinct cultural identity and governance structure. “For generations, the Zaar have endured marginalization under the Bauchi Emirate despite their unique traditions and independent heritage. Governor Bala Mohammed’s decision restores their dignity and self-determination,” the Forum stated.

He recalled that during the colonial period, British administrators subsumed the Zaar under the Fulani Bauchi Emirate for administrative convenience — even though the Zaar were neither conquered nor converted by the Fulani or Kanuri jihadists. This imposed arrangement, he said, sowed resentment and contributed to sporadic conflicts over the decades.

The MBF described the move as “a courageous and inclusive reform” that promotes equality among the diverse communities in Bauchi State. It also congratulated Brigadier-General Marcus Kokko Yake (rtd) on his appointment as the first Gung-Zaar, urging the Zaar community to support his leadership for peace and development.

The Forum further celebrated the appointment of traditional rulers in the newly established Emirates across Bauchi State, including:

• Emir of Duguri – Alhaji Adamu Mohammed
• Emir of Bununu – Alhaji Jibrin D. Hassan
• Emir of Toro – Alhaji Adamu Umar
• Emir of Lame – Alhaji Aliyu Yakubu Lame
• Emir of Ari – Alhaji Muhammad Kilishi Musa
• Emir of Burra – Alhaji Ya’u Shehu Abubakar
• Emir of Warji – Alhaji Ibrahim Samaila Boyi

In Kaduna State, the MBF also expressed appreciation to Governor Uba Sani for ensuring a smooth and peaceful transition in the Ikulu Nation, following the appointment of His Royal Highness Mr. Sunday Bature Likoro as the new Agwam Ikulu III in Zangon Kataf Local Government Area.

Binniyat praised Governor Sani’s leadership for upholding justice and transparency in handling traditional matters, noting that HRH Likoro’s appointment will strengthen community cohesion and accelerate development in Southern Kaduna.

“The governor’s commitment to dialogue and inclusivity has brought renewed hope to traditional institutions in the state,” the MBF added.

The Forum concluded by urging all newly recognized traditional leaders and communities across Bauchi and Kaduna States to unite behind their rulers, embrace reconciliation, and work collectively for sustainable peace and progress in the Middle Belt region.